Communication Apprehension among Students of Bangladesh: A Comparative Study between Online and Offline Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2022.3603%20Keywords:
Communication apprehension, Online Education, PRCA-24, Fear of communication, Lower Self-esteem, Stage FrightAbstract
This research study looks at students’ communication apprehension (CA) in online and offline classes. We wanted to comprehend whether their concern has changed about CA during online classes or not. In this quantitative research, we completed two surveys that asked them demographic questions. Four hundred and ninety-nine (499) students of public universities took part in online classes in August 2021 by completing the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension (PRCA-24). Another survey was conducted on 438 students during the offline classes in February 2022. We then analyzed the data in SPSS. The PRCA-24 scores of students in both studies determine that most of the students have high communication apprehension. They suffer from general anxiety, do not want to involve in any discussion during class, and have less self-esteem. It has been found that students' fears of communication in academic settings negatively affect their learning and performance. This study can be useful in communication disorder discipline to find out where is the actual problem to communicate. This study will pave the way for further research on what steps can be taken to overcome the problem of fear in communication or whether any changes in teaching methods can be made.
References
Aggarwal, S; Krishna, S M. (2021). Communication Apprehension and Psychological Well Being of Students in Online Learning. Behavioral Science, 11-145.
Baqutayan, S. (2011). Stress and social support. Indian journal of psychological medicine, 33(1), 29-34.
Beck, L. (2007). Social status, social support, and stress: A comparative review of the health consequences of social control factors. Health Psychology Review, 1(2), 186-207.
Biocca, F. (1992). Communication within virtual reality: Creating a space for research. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 5–22.
Blascovich, J. (2002). Social influence within immersive virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 127–145). London: Springer
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-hill.
Bragg, J. (2017). Communication apprehension among community college students: A phenomenology (Doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University).
Briggs, S. R. (1988). Shyness: Introversion or neuroticism? Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 290–307
Buhr, T. A., & Pryor, B. (1988). Communication apprehension and alcohol abuse. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3(3), 237–243
Christensen, D. H. (2012). Increasing student voice and empowerment through technology: The perceptions of communication apprehensive Latter-day Saint (LDS) seminary students. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1166
De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: The impact of role support and self-assessment on students' levels of knowledge construction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 177-188.
Dennen, V. P., & Branch, R. C. (1995). Considerations for designing instructional virtual environments. In eyes on the future: Converging images, ideas, and instruction. In Selected readings from the annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (pp. 101–110), Chicago, IL
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
Hammick, J. K., & Lee, M. J. (2014). Do shy people feel less communication apprehension online? The effects of virtual reality on the relationship between personality characteristics and communication outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 302– 310.
Ho, S. S., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35(2), 190–207.
Hosen, M. M., Nur, S., & Khatun, M. N. (2022). Role of Union Digital Centre (UDC) to Empower Rural People: A Case Study on Pabna Sadar Upazila, Bangladesh. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(5), 70-84.
Joinson, A. N. (2004). Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(4), 479–485
Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media and Society, 4(3), 355–383.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1995). The self-presentation model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 94–112). The Guilford Press.
McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos, Speech Monographs, 33:1, 65-72
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1980). The quiet ones: Shyness and communication apprehension. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick
McCroskey, J. C. (1982). An introduction to rhetorical communication, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Meyer, K. A. (2006). When topics are controversial: Is it better to discuss them face-to-face or online? Innovative Higher Education, 31, 175–186.
Noor, M. A. (2022). Factors Influencing the Implementation of Integrated Financial Management Information Systems: Study Focus on Bangladesh. South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(2), 32-55.
Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Ross, C., Simmering, M. G., Arseneault, J. M., & Orr, R. R. (2009). The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 12(3), 337-340.
Pierce, T. (2009). Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communication among teens. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1367– 1372
Quiggins, J. G. (1972). The Effects of High and Low Communication Apprehension on Small Group Member Credibility, Interpersonal Attraction, and interaction. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association, Chicago.
Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1989). An investigation of self‐ perceived communication competence and personality orientations. Communication Research Reports, 6(1), 28-36.
Rubin, A. M. (1993). The effect of locus of control on communication motivation, anxiety, and satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 41(2), 161-171.
Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students' Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20(2), 67–75.
Tamzid, M. (2022). The Indicators of Bad Selection in Private Organizations of Bangladesh. South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(2), 56-72.
Un.org. 2020. [online] Available at: <https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid
_and_education_august_2020.pdf> [Accessed 14 January 2022].
Van Hout-Wolters, B., R.-J. Simons, and S. Volet. 2000. “Active Learning: Self-directive Learning and Independent Work.” In New Learning, edited by P. R.-J. Simons, J. Van der Linden, and T. Duffy, 21–36. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Webb, E., Jones, A., Barker, P. & van Schaik, P. (2004). Using E-Learning Dialogues Within a Blended Learning Environment. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2790-2796). Lugano, Switzerland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
