The relationship of Personality Traits and Academic and Social Self Efficacies of Learning Disabilities (LD) Learners
Keywords:
Big Five personality, learning disabilities, academic self-efficacy, social self-efficacyAbstract
This paper examined the relationship between Big Five personality traits (OCEAN) and academic and social self-efficacies of learning disabilities (LD) learners. A total of 89 LD learners aged 10 to 19 years old completed questionnaires measuring Big-Five personality traits (International Personality Item Pool, IPIP), academic self-efficacy (Academic Efficacy scale from the Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales, MPAL), and social self-efficacy (Social Competence Rating Scale for Children, SCRSC). Pearson correlation shows that personality traits that have a significant relationship with academic and social self-efficacies were openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness while neuroticism does not have a significant relationship with both academic and social self-efficacies. Implications for future intervention are also being discussed.
References
Angelkoska, S., Stanovska, G., & Dimitrovski, D. (2016). The personal characteristics predictors of academic success. In N. Popov, C. Wolhuter, J. Kalin, G. Hilton, J. Ogunleye, & E. Niemczyk (Eds.), Education provision to everyone: Comparing perspectives from around the world (BCES Conference Books, Vol. 16, pp. 262-268).
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bierman, K. L. (2003). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. New York: The Guilford Press.
Brown, D., & Cinamon, R. G. (2016). Contribution of personality to self-efficacy and outcome expectations in selecting a high school major among adolescents with learning disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 237–248.
Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K., & Tramayne, S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 81–90.
Brubacher, M. R., McMahon, S. D., & Keys, C. B. (2018). Self-efficacies, anxiety, and aggression among African American and Latino adolescents with disabilities. Exceptionality, 26(1), 20–34. Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 78–96.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Crane, N., Zusho, A., Ding, Y., & Cancelli, A. (2017). Domain-specific metacognitive calibration in children with learning disabilities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 72–79. Department of Social Welfare. (2014). Department of Social Welfare Statistics Report 2014, 252. Retrieved from http://www.jkm.gov.my/file/Buku JKM 2014.pdf.
Dunbar, R. L., Dingel, M. J., Dame, L. F., Winchip, J., & Petzold, A. M. (2016). Student social self-efficacy, leadership status, and academic performance in collaborative learning environments. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1507-1523.
Benlahcene, Hamid, Echee & Lubana 2020 (SAJSSH) Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 09-24
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26– 34. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.
Graziano, W.G., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness; A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, S. Briggs, & J. Johnson (Eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
Hartley, S. L., & Maclean, W. E. (2006). A review of the reliability and validity of Likert-type scales for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(11), 813–827. Heaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2012). When IQ is not everything: Intelligence, personality and academic performance at school. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 518–522. Hill, P. L., Weston, S. J., & Jackson, J. J. (2018). The co-development of perceived support and the Big Five in middle and older adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 26–33. Jensen, M. (2015). Personality Traits, Learning and Academic Achievements. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 91–118.
Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797–807.
Karmvir. (2015). Self-efficacy and emotional competence of learning disability learners: A correlational analysis. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 133–135.
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & Deyoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 248–258.
Kuldas, S., Sinnakaudan, S., Hashim, S., & Ghazali, M. (2016). Calling for the development of children’s number sense in primary schools in Malaysia. Education 3-13, 45(5), 586–598.
Levpušček, M. P., Zupančič, M., & Sočan, G. (2013). Predicting achievement in mathematics in adolescent learners. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(4), 523–551.
Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., & Krumm, S. (2016). Mathematics attitudes and their unique contribution to achievement: Going over and above cognitive ability and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 70–79.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
Benlahcene, Hamid, Echee & Lubana 2020 (SAJSSH) Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 09-24
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Preliminary report Malaysia educational blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education, Malaysia.
Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Adolescence and education: Vol. 5. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Perera, H. N., Mcilveen, P., & Oliver, M. E. (2015). The mediating roles of coping and adjustment in the relationship between personality and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 440–457.
Raghubar, K. P., & Barnes, M. A. (2016). Early numeracy skills in preschool-aged children: a review of neurocognitive findings and implications for assessment and intervention. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(2), 329–351.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behaviour: Concepts, controversies, and applications (9th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Salgado, F. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (1): 30–43
Sánchez-Cardona, I., Rodriguez-Montalbán, R., Acevedo-Soto, E., Lugo, K. N., Torres-Oquendo, F., & Toro-Alfonso, J. (2012). Self-efficacy and openness to experience as antecedent of study engagement: An exploratory analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2163–2167.
Schultz, D., & Schultz, S. E. (2009). Theories of Personality. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). San Diego: Academic Press. Sigstad, H. M. H. (2016). Significance of friendship for quality of life in adolescents with mild intellectual disability: A parental perspective. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(4), 289– 298.
Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality praits from 10 to 65: Big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330–348.
Spinath, B., Eckert, C., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Gender differences in school success: What are the roles of learners’ intelligence, personality and motivation? Educational Research, 56(2), 230–243. Stajkovic, A. D., Bandura, A., Locke, E. A., Lee, D., & Sergent, K. (2018). Test of three conceptual models of influence of the big five personality traits and self-efficacy on academic performance: A meta analytic path-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 238–245.
Benlahcene, Hamid, Echee & Lubana 2020 (SAJSSH) Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 09-24
UNICEF. (2013). The state of the world’s children, Executive summary 2013: Children with disabilities, 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/SOWC2013_Exec_Summary_ENG_Lo_Res_24_Apr_201 3.pdf.
UNICEF. (2017). Childhood disability in Malaysia: A study of knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/malaysia.
Wilson, T. M., Zheng, C., Lemoine, K. A., Martin, C. P., & Tang, Y. (2016). Achievement goals during middle childhood: Individual differences in motivation and social adjustment. Journal of Experimental Education, 84(4), 723–743.
Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. New York: Cambridge University Press. Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Di Giunta, L., Milioni, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). Academic achievement: The unique contribution of self-efficacy beliefs in self regulated learning beyond intelligence, personality traits, and self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 23(1), 158–162.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.