Assessing the Existence of Gravity Model for Bangladesh’s Trade: A Panel Data Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2020.1306Keywords:
Bilateral trade, Gravity Model, Pooled OLS, Random Effects, Fixed Effects, Hausman testAbstract
Generally, Gravity model has an important dominance in bilateral trade performance. The foremost intention of this paper is to justify the theory of Gravity model on Bangladesh’s trade activities with its sixty major bilateral trading partner countries including all members of NAFTA and SAARC by applying panel data estimation approach for data 2001 to 2015. This deed estimates the relationship between the total trade (sum of export and import) of Bangladesh with its trade partner and their size of the economies and the transportation cost of trade as proxy of distance between the trading countries. The findings of the study conclude that the shape of the trading countries’ economies has positive significant impact on their bilateral trade and cost of transport is examined a meaningful factor that it has negative impact on Bangladesh’s trade. The study comes across with the visualization that gravity theory has persistency with the trade of Bangladesh. In Bangladesh, the country specific effect indicates it is better for Bangladesh to trade with its neighboring countries rather than trading with less distance countries as the dummy coefficient of SAARC member countries is more positive significant than NAFTA member long distance countries.
References
Alam M.M., Uddin S. G. and Taufique R. M. K. (2009). Import Inflows of Bangladesh: The Gravity Model Approach. International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol.1, No.1
Achay, L. (2006). Assessing Regional Integration in North Africa. National Institute of Statistics and Applied economics, Rabat, Morocco.
Anderson, James E. & Wincoop, EV (2004). Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 42, No.3, pp.691-751.
Alam, Md. Mahmudul., Uddin, Gazi Md. Salah., Taufique, Khan Md. Raziuddin. (2009). Import inflows of Bangladesh: The Gravity Model Approach. International Journal of Economics & Finance, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 131-141.
Anaman, K.A. and Al-kharusi (2003). Analysis of Trade Flows between Brunei Darrussalam and The Europian Union. Asian Economic Bulletin, Vol.20, No.1, pp. 60-73.
Banik, N. and J. Gilbert (2008). Regional Integration and Trade Cost in South Asia, ADBI Working Paper 127, Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo.
Batna, A. (2004). India’s Global Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach. Workinkg paper No.151.
Deardorff, A.V. (1998). Determinant of bilateral trade: does gravity mode work in a neoclassical world?.In Frankel J.A. The Regionalization of the World Economy pp.1-27. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
De, P. (2006). Trade Infrastructure and Transaction Costs: The Imperatives for Asian Economic Cooperation. Journal of Economic Integration, Vol.21, No.4, pp. 708-735.
De, P. and Ghosh B. (2008). Reassessing Transaction Costs of Trade at the India–Bangladesh Border. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.43, No.29, pp. 69-79.
Fink, C., A. Mattoo, and I. C. Neagu, (2005). Assessing the Impact of Communication Costs on International Trade? Journal of International Economics, Vol. 67, pp. 428-445.
Filippini, C. and Molini, V. (2003). The Determinants of East Asian Trade Flows: A Gravity Equation Approach. Journal of Asian Economics, Vol.14, No.5, pp.695-711.
Gani, A. (2008). Factors Influencing Trade Between Fiji And Its Asian Partners. Pacific Economic Bulletin, Vol.23, No. 2, The Australian National University.
Gujarati, N. Damodar (2007). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill: New York. 4th Edition.
Hermawan M. (2011). The Determinant and Trade Potential of Export of The Indonesia’s Textile Products: A Gravity Model. Global Economy and Finance Journal, Vol.4, No.2, pp. 13- 32.
Hassan, M. K. (2000). International Trade with SAARC and Trade Policies of Bangladesh. Journal of Economic Cooperation. Vol.21, No. 3, pp. 99-152.
Hassan, M.K. (2001). Is SAARC a Viable Economic Block? Evidence from Gravity Model. Journal of Asian Economics, 12: 263-290.
Hassan K. M., Mehanna A. R. and Basher A.S. (2001). Regional Cooperation in Trade, Finance and Investment among SAARC Countries: The Bangladesh Perspective.
Husain S. and Yasmin S. (2015). Does the Gravity Model Explain Bangladesh’s Direction of Trade? A Panel Data Approach. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance IOSR-JEF, Vol.6, Issue 3, pp. 01-14.
Hossain,Sharif M. (2009). South Asian Free Trade Area: Implications for Bangladesh, MPRA paper No. 18517.
Iqbal H. M. and Islam F. A. (2014). Determinants of Bilateral Trade between Bangladesh and European Union: Approach of Gravity Model under the Panel Data. Issues in Business Management and Economics, Vol.2, No.5, pp. 087-093.
Khan I. T., Akber I. M. and Sadique Z. M. (2013). Impact of Trade Cost on Bangladesh’s Trade: A Gravity Model Approach. Investigations in Trade and Investment, Phuket, Thailand.
Karamuriro, T. H. and Karukuza N.W. (2015), Determinants of Uganda’s Export Performance: A Gravity Model Analysis. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, Vol.4, No.2, pp. 45-54.
Martinez-Zarzoso and Nowak-Lehmann D. 2002. Augmented Gravity Model: An Empirical Application to Mercosur-European Union Trade Flows. Working Paper, DB Nr. 77.
Mohmand, T. Y., Salman A., Mughal S. K., Imran M. and Makarevic N. (2015). Export Potential of Pakistan: Evidence from the Gravity Model of Trade. European Journal of Economic Studies, Vol.14, Issue4, pp. 212-220.
Nahar, B. And Siriwardana M. (2009). Impact of Trade Liberalization on Poverty in Bangladesh: A Quantitative Assessment. South Asia Economic Journal, Vol.10, No.2, pp. 325-369
Oguledo, V.I. and Macphee, C.R. (1994). Gravity Models: A Reformulation and an Application to Discriminatory Trade Arrangements. Applied Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 107-120.
Roy M. and Rayhan I. M. (2011). Import flows of Bangladesh: Gravity Model Approach under Panel Data Methodology. Institute of statistical and Training (ISPT), Vol.60 No.2 pp.153-157, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Roy, M. and Rayhan, I. (2011). Trade Flows of Bangladesh: A Gravity Model Approach. Economics Bulletin, Vol.31, No.1, pp. 950 -959.
Rahman, M. M. (2003). A Panel Data of Bangladesh‘s Trade: The Gravity Model Approach.’ Paper presented at the European Trade Study Group (ETSG) 2003 Programme, Madrid. Available at http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2003/papers/rahman.pdf
Rahman, M. (2004). The Determinants of Bangladesh’s Trade: Evidence from the Generalised Gravity Model. The Economic Society of Australia’s 33 Conference of Economists, University of Sydney, Australia.
Rahman, M. M. (2009). Australia’s Global Trade Potential: Evidence from the Gravity Model Analysis. In: Oxford Business and Economics Conference, 24-26 June 2009, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Sharma, S. C. and Chua, S.Y. (2000). ASEAN: Economic Integration and Intra-Regional Trade. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 165-69.
Whalley, J. (1996). Why Do Countries Seek Regional Trade Agreements? NBER Working Paper No. 5552, NBER, Cambridge.
World Bank (2010). World Development Indicators 2010. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Yamarik, S. and Ghosh, S. (2005). A Sensitivity Analysis of the Gravity Model The International Trade Journal, Vol. 19, Issue 1, Spring.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.