Organizational Justice and its Impact on Achieving Marketing Prowess: Analytical Study in Samawah Cement Factory

Authors

  • Jasim Rahi Kadim Federal board of supreme audit / Muthanna Control Directorate Author
  • Yousif Mousa Sabti PhD Scholar, Faculty Of Administration & Economics Department Of Bussinisess Administration, University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia Author
  • Ghazanfar Ali Associate Lecturer, The Islamia University Nahawalpur, Pakistan. Author
  • Sadeq Mehdi Shliot Federal board of supreme audit / Muthanna Control Directorate Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2112

Keywords:

distributive justice, procedural justice, interactive justice, marketingprowess

Abstract

The current research chose the dimensions of organizational justice (distributive justice,  procedural justice, interactive justice) and exclusion marketing prowess these are exploring  opportunities, exploiting opportunities, and marketing flexibility. The purpose of the research  was to test the possibility of organizational justice contributing to achieving marketing prowess.  And standing at the level of both organizational justice and marketing prowess, and from here it  becomes clear to us its importance. And by searching for the problem through a group of  questions centered on whether there is a correlation and influence between the research variables,  and in light of this, a hypothetical model was constructed from which the main and sub-research  hypotheses emerged. To test the validity of the hypotheses, the data were collected through the  questionnaire tool, and it was prepared for this purpose. A sample represented the size of (40)  workers in the researched laboratory. The data were analyzed using a set of statistical methods  and the results were extracted using the computer program (v.16 SPSS), and in light of the  results and analyzes, the research reached a set of conclusions, including the decrease in workers  ’sense of fairness of wage distribution procedures. And rewards for workers would cause the  worker to lose the performance evaluation criteria, and to separate the goals of the worker from  the goals of the organization. Finally, the research presented a set of recommendations, which is  the necessity of setting fixed standards for each department in the laboratory to work so that the  worker can, through these criteria, evaluate his performance and know his duties and rights.  Also, laboratory management must take care to involve all workers in making decisions that  affect their work, which contributes to making these decisions more effective. 

References

Angelo, K., & Kreitner, R. (2001). Organizational Behavior. International Edition.

Asgari, A., Silong, A. D., Ahmad, A., & Samah, B. A. (2008). The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, organizational justice, leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, trust in management and organizational citizenship behaviors. European Journal of Scientific Research, 23(2), 227-242.

Brockner, J. (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of management review, 27(1), 58-76.

Combe, I., Kouropalatis, Y., Hughes, P., & Morgan, R. E. (2012). Pursuing “flexible commitment” as strategic ambidexterity. European Journal of Marketing. 46 (10),1389-1417

Cravens, D. W., & Piercy, N. (2006). Strategic marketing (Vol. 7). Columbus: McGraw-Hill.

Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of management perspectives, 21(4), 34-48.

Dolan, S. L., Tzafrir, S. S., & Baruch, Y. (2005). Testing the causal relationships between procedural justice, trust and organizational citizenship behavior. Revue de gestion des Resources Humaines, 57, 79- 89.

Farahbod, F., Azadehdel, M., Rezaei-Dizgah, M., & Nezhadi-Jirdehi, M. (2012). Organizational citizenship behavior: The role of organizational justice and leader–member exchange. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 893–903.

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.

Hooshmand, L., & Moghimi, S. M. (2011). Organizational Justice and Organizational Entrepreneurship in Managers and Experts in RMTO. European Journal of Scientific Research, 65(4), 553-463.

Huang, P. W. (2010). Why and How to be Ambidextrous? The Relationship between Environmental Factors, Innovation Strategy and Organizational Capabilities. University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Jamaludin, Z. (2009). Perceived organizational justice and its impact to the development of commitments: a regression analysis. World Journal of Management, 1(1), 49-61.

Johnson, J. S. (2007). Organizational justice, moral ideology, and moral evaluation as antecedents of moral intent (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech).

Nwokah, N. G., & Ondukwu, F. E. (2009). Competitive intelligence and marketing effectiveness in corporate organizations in Nigeria. African Journal of Marketing Management, 1(1), 010-022.

Pai, A. (2007). Overcoming the Innovator's Dilemma through Organisational Ambidexterity within the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).

Paterson, J. M., Green, A., & Cary, J. (2002). The measurement of organizational justice in organizational change programmes: A reliability, validity and context‐sensitivity assessment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(4), 393-408.

Prange, C., Bruyaka, O., Tung, R., & Stahl, G. K. (2016). Better at home, abroad, or both? How Chinese firms use ambidextrous internationalization strategies to drive innovation. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management.

Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894.

Tatum, B. C., & Eberlin, R. J. (2008). The relationship between organizational justice and conflict style. Business Strategy Series.9(6)

Tempelaar, M. (2010). Organizing for ambidexterity: Studies on the pursuit of exploration and exploitation through differentiation, integration, contextual and individual attributes (No. EPS-2010-191- STR).

Van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Martens, T., & Bouwen, R. (2006). Exploring requisites and antecedents of continuous innovation. Available at SSRN 874908.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-01